Sustainable Engineering of Infrastructure

uniassist

(1) Only those who have applied by the deadline and in the correct manner will qualify for the selection

process.

(2) The selection process comprises two stages. In the first stage, all applicants participating in the

selection process are ranked according to the grade of their undergraduate degree. If, in individual

cases, the applicant has not yet been awarded an undergraduate degree, the average grade of their

examination results to date shall determine the extent of their qualification.

(3) In the second stage, the selection committee shall assess the fourfold number of the pre-determined

number of admissions by means of a university admissions test.

(4) The selection committee shall review the documents submitted by the applicant and, based on these,

award points for the selection criteria defined in § 6, which are decisive for determining the ranking.

§ 6 Selection Criteria for the Selection Process

(1) The ranking of the places to be allocated in the selection process is based on the average grade of

the applicant's entrance qualification for the Master's program and the results of their admissions test

according to paragraph 2. However, the average grade of the entrance qualification is to be given

primary importance. A maximum of 105 points can be awarded in the selection process. In accordance

with Appendix 1, the average grade of the applicant's undergraduate degree counts for 57%, i.e. up to

60 points, towards the final selection decision.

(2) In addition to the average grade of the applicant's undergraduate degree, the ranking of the places

to be allocated in the selection process is determined by the results of the admissions test according to

paragraph 3.

The admissions test requires the applicant to describe the objectives, methodology and an overview of

the results of their thesis. The admissions test consists of an exposé, written in English, with a maximum

length of 7,500 characters, including spaces. It is designed to demonstrate the applicant's ability to

produce academic work and show that they are able to summarize complex issues clearly and concisely.

The applicant can be awarded a maximum score of 45 points. The selection committee will take the

following criteria into account when making its decision and compiling the ranking list:

• organization and structure
• language and practical orientation
• quality of academic work